Corporate Social Responsibility starts with your own employees

A couple of days ago my bible app opened with this verse of the day: ‘To do righteousness and justice is more acceptable to the LORD than sacrifice’ (Proverbs 21:3). 

This text reminded me of the way some companies deal with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Rather than doing the right thing, they do the wrong thing and compensate for this by deploying CSR initiatives. There is even a special term describing this phenomenon: ‘Greenwashing’. In this context, it is no wonder that two professors from IMD (a leading Swiss Business School) published an article in 2018 with the provocative title: ‘Why nobody takes corporate social responsibility seriously’.

CSR is not optional anymore

In the past decade, CSR has become more and more popular, not in the least because it makes sense from a commercial perspective. Already in 2009, a study by McKinsey showed that two-thirds of CFOs and three-quarters of investment professionals agreed that CSR activities created value for shareholders in normal economic times. 

According to a recent article by the same consulting firm, this is true in the current COVID-19 crisis as well: ‘The way organizations deal with their customers, their employees and the broader community in a crisis is likely to leave lasting memories in customers’ minds.’ 

Beyond a marketing ploy?

Despite the positive impact CSR has on our society, there are at least three reasons why it is often seen as a marketing ploy:

  • No common definition or robust standards
  • Inconsistent business practices (Walking the talk)
  • The way companies treat their own employees

No common definition or robust standards

CSR standards fall short on multiple fronts. First of all, there is no common definition of what CSR exactly means. Secondly, despite initiatives like the GRI, there are no uniform standards and reporting guidelines, which provides organizations with the possibility to pick and choose the standards they want to adhere to. Thirdly, and perhaps most seriously, the value of CSR reports (for instance as part of the Annual report) is severely limited.

If the same level of scrutiny were to be applied in their financial reporting, companies would be free to choose which accounting principles they would adhere to, how to interpret them and how to report on them.

Inconsistent business practices (Walking the talk)

The second reason is that there are unfortunately a number of examples of organizations whose business practices were not aligned with their CSR principles. A Google search on ‘corporate sustainability failures’ results in 46.5 million hits. It is depressing to read about all the companies (for instance in the automotive, financial services and professional services industry) that claimed the moral high ground in public, but deliberately created damage to the general public, consumers or shareholders, through their actions. 

Some CSR efforts are even downright comical. E.g. an oil & gas company that uses the greenness of the supply chain of potential suppliers in its vendor selection process, or a highly profitable financial services company with a dubious reputation, that encourages employees to paint local schools ‘to give back’ to society.

In this context also the behaviors of business leaders should be taken into account. Watch for instance this video taken during the WEF forum in Davos in 2019…

The way companies treat their own employees

If the lack of robust standards and inconsistent business practices are reasons why the general public might be skeptical about the CSR initiatives of a company, the way organizations treat their own employees is often the reason why employees are skeptical. 

A number of companies are very outspoken about their concerns for the society they serve, but, surprisingly enough, seem to be far less interested in the way they treat their own employees (who, after all, are part of that same society…).

Examples include organizations with noble CSR principles, whose recruitment practices, objective setting, performance evaluation and (re)staffing processes can be characterized as social Darwinistic. Organizations that seem to have systemic problems with diversity & inclusiveness and sexual misconduct also fall in this category.

A number of these practices are not only questionable from an ethical perspective, but they also destroy value. Value in the form of human capital, value in the form of shareholder value (financial compensation), and, last but not least, value in the form of employee engagement. 

Employee engagement is one of the biggest determinants of corporate success. Employees will be the first to notice inconsistencies between what leaders say, and what they actually do … starting with the way they are treated by these leaders.

In these COVID-19 times, many business leaders face difficult choices regarding their labor force. The way they will deal with their employees will have a big impact on the corporate memory of their organization. Notions like mutual trust and loyalty spring to mind. In this context employability related decisions around and investments in upskilling, reskilling, and career transition support are crucial.

Corporate social responsibility comes at a price

In our society organizations are free to choose to which extent they want to invest in CSR. There are several examples of well-known companies that do not (significantly) invest in CSR, without a noticeable effect on their business results. 

However, once a company decides to publicly choose the moral high ground, it needs to be willing to also invest in this. Not only by formulating high-minded mission statements, vision statements, and business principles, but also by doing the right thing (‘righteousness and justice’), even, or perhaps especially, when this comes at a cost. In order to safeguard not only their own credibility, but the credibility of corporate social responsibility as a phenomenon in our society, these companies need to be willing and able to live up to their self-declared principles, including, and perhaps especially, concerning their own employees.

A small, but highly tangible, example of a company doing the right thing, was an apparel company that had to shut down a large manufacturing operation in a developing country. Rather than selling or moving the equipment (mainly sewing machines) and inventory, they decided to handed it over to the employees in order to enable them to start their own businesses.

“If your actions don’t live up to your words, you have nothing to say.” (DaShanne Stokes)

© Dirk Verburg 2020

Disclaimer: Views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author

Photo credits: DutchAperture

Are you ready for a post Covid-19 world?

The world will fundamentally change in the next decade

Whether you are listening to McKinsey, the IMF or the Economist, all modern-day prophets of doom agree that COVID-19 is having a devastating impact on our society and the economy. This impact will be felt long after this pandemic has passed.

Although I am not an incarnation of Alvin Toffler, the famous futurist and author of ‘Megatrends’, merely by observing the news and talking to clients and colleagues, I see a couple of clear trends and tipping points, which lead me to believe that the ‘new normal’ will look different than the ‘old normal’.

Continue reading

The Negative Feedback Paradox

Let me start with a confession:I never liked receiving negative feedback, and have spent the largest part of my professional life ignoring it.

I found ignoring negative (or perhaps I should euphemistically say ‘corrective’) feedback to be quite easy. Depending on the situation, I either did not take the person who gave me feedback seriously (‘that is rich – from him?’), comforted myself that the feedback concerned only a minor issue in the grand scheme of my behavior (and that other aspects of my behavior would compensate this), or convinced myself that the person giving me feedback did not understand the context in which I acted the way I did or said the things I said.

It was not until I hit a serious roadblock in my career, that I started to see the fact that systematically ignoring feedback was not necessarily a great idea. 

Continue reading

The Art of Employee Engagement (Book Review)

Employee engagement is a topic close to my heart. In the past two decades I have designed, managed and implemented the findings of engagement surveys multiple times, and also managed to write an article with my point of view on how to make them ‘work’.

Given my interest in this topic, I was very pleased to receive a copy of ‘The Art of Employee Engagement’ by Marijn Faassen. I read it in one go, because I found it a fascinating read, for a number of reasons:

Continue reading

Decision making for a new Decade

Every year millions of people around the world make New Year’s resolutions. Given that we are currently starting the 2020’s, we have the exciting opportunity to make resolutions for a whole new decade!

I decided to make mine around decision making. The reason for this was the fact that I had the opportunity to read ‘Unlocking Leadership Mindtraps – How to thrive in complexity’ by Jennifer Garvey Berger during the Christmas vacation.

One of the key notions in this book is that the world has become much more interconnected and therefore more complex. Unfortunately, our decision-making skills are ‘brilliantly designed – for an older, less connected, and more predictable version of the world’. In this context, Jennifer Garvey Berger mentions five mind traps we can find ourselves in, one of them being trapped in ‘Simple stories.

Continue reading

Building an authentic personal brand starts with ‘why?

Two weeks ago, I was asked to participate in an event about personal branding. The organizer asked me to focus specifically on the link between creating a personal brand and remaining authentic.

Because I have been irritated by the majority of the publications on this topic in the last 5+ years, I was excited to speak about it. Why? Because these articles often suggest people need a partial, or even full, make-over, in order to fit the mold of the specific environment they seek employment in. If that does not feel natural to them, the second piece of advice most publications give them is: ‘Fake it until you make it’.

Continue reading